According to an 18-year research study focusing on white-collar professionals, jobs that are stressful and perceived as offering low rewards can elevate the risk of heart disease in men by a factor of two. These results underscore the imperative for more salubrious work settings.
The study identifies job strain and high efforts paired with low rewards as individual psychosocial stress factors associated with an increased risk of heart disease. When combined, these factors pose a particularly escalated risk for men.
Men who experience stressful work conditions and also perceive that their efforts are met with low rewards were found to have double the risk of developing heart disease in contrast to men who did not report these stress factors. This combined impact was akin to the effect of obesity on the risk of coronary heart disease, based on the study’s evaluation of nearly 6,500 white-collar employees in Canada. The research did not draw conclusive results regarding the impact of work stress on women’s cardiac health.
The findings were published on September 19 in the peer-reviewed journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes by the American Heart Association.
Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud, R.D., M.S., the principal study author and doctoral candidate at the Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit at CHU de Quebec-University Laval Research Center in Quebec, Canada, emphasized that “Given the substantial amount of time people invest in their jobs, comprehending the nexus between work-related stress and cardiovascular health is essential for both public health and employee well-being.” Lavigne-Robichaud stressed that there is an urgent need to address these workplace stressors to cultivate healthier work environments that benefit both employees and employers.
Table of Contents
Heart Disease: A Preeminent Health Risk
According to statistics from the American Heart Association, heart disease remains the leading cause of mortality in the United States. Nearly 383,000 American citizens succumbed to heart disease in the year 2020 alone.
While individual research projects have previously identified job strain and effort-reward imbalance as stress factors that elevate heart disease risk, few have investigated their combined impact.
In detailing the stressors, Lavigne-Robichaud elucidated that “Job strain characterizes workplaces where employees encounter a blend of high job demands and limited control over their duties. Effort-reward imbalance transpires when employees exert significant effort in their tasks but perceive the rewards, such as salary or recognition, to be insufficient or disproportionate.”
Principal Research Outcomes
Key findings from the study include:
- Men who reported experiencing either job strain or effort-reward imbalance saw a 49% rise in heart disease risk compared to men who did not report these stress factors.
- Men who reported both stress factors faced a twofold risk of heart disease.
- The research could not conclusively determine the impact of these stress factors on women’s cardiac health.
Lavigne-Robichaud concluded, “Our data propose that interventions aimed at mitigating workplace stress could be particularly advantageous for men and may also yield benefits for women, as such stressors are linked with other widespread health issues such as depression.”
Potential Strategies and Wider Implications
Potential interventions might include resource support, work-life balance promotion, better communication, and empowerment of employees in their roles, according to Lavigne-Robichaud.
Dr. Eduardo J. Sanchez, M.D., M.P.H., FAHA, FAAFP, the Chief Medical Officer for Prevention at the American Heart Association, stated, “The American workforce is among the most stressed globally, and these work-related stressors can have health impacts equivalent to obesity and secondhand smoke exposure. This research amplifies the growing body of evidence that workplaces should be prioritized for cardiovascular health improvement initiatives.”
Research Specifics
- The study followed almost 6,500 white-collar employees with an average age of approximately 45, who were initially free of heart disease, for a period of 18 years from 2000 to 2018.
- The cohort included 3,118 men and 3,347 women working in a diverse range of roles in Quebec, Canada.
- Established health databases were used to retrieve information on heart disease, and validated questionnaires were utilized to measure job strain and effort-reward imbalance.
One limitation of the study is its focus on white-collar employees primarily in Quebec, Canada, which may not fully represent the diverse American working population. Nevertheless, the findings could be applicable to white-collar employees in the United States and other high-income nations with comparable job structures, according to Lavigne-Robichaud.
Reference: “Psychosocial Stressors at Work and Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Men and Women: 18-Year Prospective Cohort Study of Combined Exposures” by Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud et al., 19 September 2023, Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009700
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Heart Disease Risk and Workplace Stress
What is the main focus of the 18-year research study on white-collar professionals?
The primary focus of the 18-year research study is to examine the impact of workplace stress factors, specifically job strain and effort-reward imbalance, on the risk of heart disease among white-collar professionals. The study found that men who experience these stress factors have double the risk of developing heart disease compared to those who do not.
Who is the lead author of the study and what institution are they affiliated with?
The lead author of the study is Mathilde Lavigne-Robichaud, R.D., M.S., a doctoral candidate at the Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit at CHU de Quebec-University Laval Research Center in Quebec, Canada.
Did the study find any conclusive results about the effect of work stress on women’s heart health?
No, the study did not yield conclusive results regarding the impact of work-related stress factors on women’s heart health.
What are the key psychosocial stress factors identified in the study?
The study identifies two key psychosocial stress factors that impact the risk of heart disease: job strain and effort-reward imbalance. Job strain is characterized by high job demands and low control, while effort-reward imbalance occurs when employees perceive the rewards they receive, such as salary and recognition, as insufficient compared to the effort they invest in their work.
What are the primary research outcomes?
The key findings of the study include a 49% increase in heart disease risk for men who reported either job strain or effort-reward imbalance. Men who reported both stress factors were at twice the risk of heart disease compared to those who did not report these stressors.
What are some potential interventions to mitigate workplace stress as mentioned in the study?
The study suggests that potential interventions could include resource support, work-life balance promotion, enhanced communication, and empowerment of employees in decision-making and task performance.
What is one limitation of the study?
One limitation is that the research primarily focused on white-collar workers in Quebec, Canada. Therefore, the results might not fully represent the diverse American working population, although they may still be applicable to white-collar employees in high-income countries with similar job structures.
How many participants were involved in the study?
The study followed nearly 6,500 white-collar employees for a period of 18 years. The cohort included 3,118 men and 3,347 women who were initially free of heart disease.
What are the broader implications of this study?
The study amplifies the growing body of evidence that suggests the need for workplaces to prioritize cardiovascular health. It also underscores the urgent necessity to address psychosocial stress factors in the work environment for both public health and workforce well-being.
Is the study peer-reviewed?
Yes, the study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes by the American Heart Association.
More about Heart Disease Risk and Workplace Stress
- American Heart Association Statistics on Heart Disease
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes Journal
- CHU de Quebec-University Laval Research Center
- Understanding Job Strain
- Psychosocial Stressors at Work
- Effort-Reward Imbalance and Health
- Workplace Interventions for Stress Reduction
6 comments
I knew stress was bad but had no clue it was this bad. Double the risk? Time to rethink my priorities I guess.
Wow, this is eye-opening. Never really thought how my job could literally be a matter of life n death. Maybe its time to reconsider work-life balance.
The fact that they couldn’t find conclusive results on women is pretty interesting too. Wonder if its because women handle stress differently or the job roles are different. Needs more investigation for sure.
This research is well-timed. The pandemic’s already put so much strain on us and now this. It’s high time companies take this seriously and focus on employees’ well-being.
seriously, the workplace needs to step up. Can’t believe job stress is comparable to obesity in terms of heart disease risk. Employers, are you listening?
18 years is a long time for a study, must be pretty solid findings. But yeah, how relevant is this to blue-collar jobs, or is this just a white-collar problem?