Research indicates that dog owners frequently have a stronger emotional bond with their dogs compared to cats, and are more likely to invest financially in their care. This sentiment could stem from prevailing notions about cats being more self-sufficient. However, a study spearheaded by Dr. Peter Sandøe and his research group, surveying pet owners in Denmark, Austria, and the United Kingdom, revealed that although dogs generally received superior care in all surveyed nations, the extent of this preference was not uniform, suggesting that cultural influences significantly shape these attitudes.
The researchers gathered data from pet owners in three different countries and found that there was a more significant emotional and financial investment in dogs than in cats. Nonetheless, this predilection showed considerable variations among the countries surveyed.
Is the level of care for dogs inherently greater than for cats? Existing research suggests that some pet owners may experience a more robust emotional attachment to dogs, possibly because of the perception that cats are more autonomous and require less care. However, it is important to emphasize that these findings may not hold universally, as they may not account for cultural differences in pet-owner relationships. To further explore this subject, a team led by Dr. Peter Sandøe of the University of Copenhagen initiated an in-depth investigation.
Dr. Sandøe, the study’s leading author published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, stated, “Our intent was to discern whether cats might eventually attain the same high level of status that dogs currently enjoy.”
Table of Contents
Analyzing Attitudes: The Methodology
To conduct their research, the scientists partnered with a survey firm to obtain representative samples of adult pet owners from Denmark, Austria, and the United Kingdom. These Western and Central European nations share various similarities but differ in their history of urbanization: the UK was the earliest to urbanize, followed by Austria, and Denmark was the last. The research team hypothesized that this varied history with domestic animals could influence current societal attitudes towards pets.
The final sample comprised 2,117 pet owners, including 844 dog owners, 872 cat owners, and 401 individuals who owned both animals. Participants answered a range of questions designed to assess various dimensions of pet care, including the Lexington attachment to pets scale, questions about investment in veterinary services, and expectations regarding available treatments.
Differences in Pet Care Across Countries
The findings revealed that individuals in all surveyed countries showed a higher level of care for dogs over cats, in both emotional attachment and financial investment. However, the extent of this preference exhibited significant variations among the nations. For instance, while in the UK the preference for dogs was only marginal, it was notably more pronounced in Austria, and extremely so in Denmark.
Dr. Sandøe commented, “The differential levels of care for dogs and cats are not universally applicable. We propose that cultural factors, including the degree to which pets share living spaces with their owners, significantly influence these attitudes.”
Other metrics showed similar patterns. The gap in emotional attachment between dog and cat owners was most substantial in Denmark, and Danish pet owners were also least likely to insure their cats compared to their dogs.
Theories and Future Research
The researchers speculated that this could be due to the countries’ different histories with agriculture and the roles that animals played. Other possible influencing factors could include the comparative costs of medical treatments for dogs and cats, or the functional roles that these animals play in people’s daily lives, such as providing exercise.
Professor Clare Palmer from Texas A&M University, a co-author, cautioned, “Our study is limited to three European countries and raises interesting questions that comparative studies in other nations could elucidate. It is conceivable that in some countries, cats may receive an even higher level of care and emotional investment than dogs.”
Study Reference
The study, titled “Do people really care less about their cats than about their dogs? A comparative study in three European countries,” was authored by Peter Sandøe, Clare Palmer, Sandra A. Corr, Svenja Springer, and Thomas Bøker Lund, and was published on September 11, 2023, in Frontiers in Veterinary Science. The research was financially supported by the Danish Centre for Companion Animal Welfare.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Multinational Pet Preferences
What was the main objective of the study conducted by Dr. Peter Sandøe and his team?
The primary goal of the study led by Dr. Peter Sandøe and his team was to investigate the emotional and financial investments pet owners make in dogs compared to cats across three European countries: Denmark, Austria, and the United Kingdom. They aimed to understand the extent of this preference and how cultural factors influence it.
How did the researchers gather data for their study?
The researchers collaborated with a survey company to collect data from representative samples of adult pet owners in the three countries. The survey included questions related to emotional attachment, investment in veterinary care, and expectations for available treatments.
Did the study find differences in pet care preferences among the surveyed countries?
Yes, the study revealed notable differences in pet care preferences. While dogs received more care and emotional attachment than cats across all surveyed nations, the degree of preference varied significantly. For instance, Denmark showed a pronounced preference for dogs, while the preference was less marked in the United Kingdom.
What factors were proposed as potential reasons for these differences in pet care preferences?
The study suggested that cultural factors, including the degree to which pets share living spaces with their owners and historical roles of animals in these countries, could influence these attitudes. Other factors such as the cost of medical treatments and the functional roles of pets in daily life were also considered.
Were there any limitations to this study?
Yes, the study had limitations. It focused on three European countries and may not represent global attitudes towards pet care. Additionally, cultural and societal factors are complex, and further research in other countries could provide additional insights into pet care preferences.
What was the publication where the study’s findings were presented?
The study, titled “Do people really care less about their cats than about their dogs? A comparative study in three European countries,” was published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science on September 11, 2023.
Who provided financial support for this research?
The research was financially supported by the Danish Centre for Companion Animal Welfare.
4 comments
wow this study is interestin it say ppl like dogs more than cats, but not all same. cultral things probly importnt, dogs r luv evrywhere?
Impressive research, but, more data needed from othr countries, too. We c if it same trend everywhere.
I agre, it’s surpising that peeps luv dogs more, cats r cool too tho. How they do this survey?
study says UK not care as much bout dogs, but they luv cats, intersting! wonder what other countreys like.