The image depicts a simulation of the expansive, luminous body generated as a result of a planetary impact. In the immediate view, shards of ice and rock are propelled from the point of impact, and are predicted to later traverse the space between Earth and the parent star, visible in the image’s backdrop. Credit: Mark Garlick
A global group of astronomers has documented the collision of two ice giant exoplanets orbiting a star similar to our sun, giving rise to a powerful surge of light and a cloud of particulates. This groundbreaking revelation may pave the way for the genesis of additional moons orbiting a nascent planet in the foreseeable future.
The research, disclosed today (October 11) in the journal Nature, elucidates the occurrence of two ice giant exoplanets colliding in the vicinity of a sun-like star, culminating in a brilliant flare of light and billowing plumes of particulate matter. The investigation reveals the vivid thermal afterglow and the subsequent dust cloud that obscured the parent star progressively.
Table of Contents
A Joint Observational Initiative
The consortium of international astronomers was assembled following an enthusiast’s scrutiny of the star’s light curve, which displayed peculiar characteristics. The data indicated a two-fold increase in the star’s infrared brightness approximately three years prior to its dimming in the visible light spectrum.
Dr. Matthew Kenworthy, Co-Lead Author from Leiden University, stated, “Frankly, this observation caught me off guard. As we disseminated the visible light curve data among the astronomical community, we commenced an extensive observation campaign employing a series of telescopes.”
“A colleague using social media noted the star’s increase in infrared brightness more than a thousand days preceding its dimming in visible light. I immediately understood that we were witnessing an extraordinary event.”
Stellar Surveillance and Analysis
Over an ensuing two-year period, a team of both professional and amateur astronomers intensively observed changes in the star’s luminosity. The star received the designation ASASSN-21qj, named after the observational network that initially identified the star’s diminishing brightness in the visible spectrum.
After comprehensive analysis, the research team posited that the most plausible scenario was a collision between two ice giant exoplanets, as corroborated by infrared illumination detected by NASA’s NEOWISE mission, an initiative that employs a space telescope to track asteroids and comets.
Input from Co-Lead Scientists
Dr. Simon Lock, Research Fellow in Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol and co-lead author, elaborated, “Our computational simulations and numerical analyses are in line with the dimensions and temperature of the radiant material, along with the duration of the luminescence, which corroborate the theory of an ice giant exoplanet collision.”
The ensuing expansive cloud of debris from the impact event subsequently transited in front of the parent star roughly three years later, leading to a gradual attenuation of the star’s brightness in visible wavelengths.
Upcoming Observations and Forecasts
In the years to come, it is anticipated that the dust cloud will disperse along the orbital trajectory of the collision remnants. Astronomers may discern light scattering from this cloud through both terrestrial telescopes and NASA’s most advanced space telescope, known as JWST.
Future scrutiny of the system is a high priority for the astronomers involved.
Dr. Zoe Leinhardt, Co-author and Associate Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Bristol, added, “Future observations will undoubtedly be riveting. Ultimately, it is plausible that the aggregate matter surrounding the collision remnant could coalesce, giving rise to a new assembly of moons in orbit around the emergent planet.”
Reference: “A planetary collision afterglow and transit of the resultant debris cloud” by Matthew Kenworthy, Simon Lock, Grant Kennedy, Richelle van Capelleveen, Eric Mamajek, Ludmila Carone, Franz-Josef Hambsch, Joseph Masiero, Amy Mainzer, J. Davy Kirkpatrick, Edward Gomez, Zoë Leinhardt, Jingyao Dou, Pavan Tanna, Arttu Sainio, Hamish Barker, Stéphane Charbonnel, Olivier Garde, Pascal Le Dû, Lionel Mulato, Thomas Petit, and Michael Rizzo Smith, published on 11 October 2023 in Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06573-9
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Planetary Collision
What is the primary subject of the research?
The research primarily focuses on the collision of two ice giant exoplanets around a sun-like star. The collision resulted in a powerful burst of light and a cloud of particulate matter.
Who conducted this research?
The research was conducted by an international team of astronomers, led by co-authors Dr. Matthew Kenworthy from Leiden University and Dr. Simon Lock, Research Fellow in Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol.
Where was the research published?
The findings were published in the scientific journal Nature on October 11, 2023.
What was the key observation made in this study?
The key observation was a significant surge in light and the creation of a dust cloud, both a result of the collision of two ice giant exoplanets. The event was initially flagged due to unusual readings in the star’s light curve, which doubled in infrared brightness approximately three years before dimming in visible light.
What are the future implications of this research?
The research suggests that the collision may lead to the formation of new moons around a newly-formed planet. The debris cloud is expected to disperse along the orbital path of the collision remnants, and future light scattering from this cloud could be observed through both ground-based telescopes and NASA’s largest space telescope, known as JWST.
How was the star involved in the research named?
The star involved was named ASASSN-21qj. It was named after the network of telescopes that first detected the star’s dimming in visible wavelengths.
What does the research speculate about the formation of moons?
The research speculates that the mass of material generated by the planetary collision may eventually coalesce to form a retinue of moons orbiting a newly-formed planet.
What methods were used to observe this event?
Both professional and amateur astronomers used a network of telescopes to monitor changes in the star’s brightness over a two-year period. Infrared data was collected through NASA’s NEOWISE mission.
What was the initial trigger for this research?
An enthusiast initially observed something peculiar in the star’s light curve, leading to the formation of the international team of astronomers who carried out the research.
Is further observation planned?
Yes, the astronomers plan to continue observing the system closely to understand what happens next, particularly whether the debris cloud will coalesce into new moons.
More about Planetary Collision
- Nature Journal Publication
- NASA’s NEOWISE Mission
- Leiden University Astronomy Department
- University of Bristol Earth Sciences
- ASASSN Telescope Network
- JWST Space Telescope
8 comments
This paper is going to be cited for years, mark my words. it’s not every day you get to witness planetary collisions and think about moon formations.
Wow, this is mind-blowing stuff. Never thought I’d see the day when we could actually catch planets colliding in real time. What a time to be alive.
The level of detail in the observations is amazing. From infrared to visible light, they covered all bases. Stellar job by the team!
can’t wait to see how this pans out in the future. Will definitely be keeping tabs on this research. so many questions yet to be answered.
The part where they talked about forming new moons was intriguing. I wonder how this discovery will impact our understanding of our own solar system?
Seriously, this is some next-level research! I mean, forming new moons? That’s sci-fi becoming reality. hats off to the team.
It’s crazy how social media played a role in all of this. Someone just noticed something off and boom, groundbreaking research is born.
This makes you realize just how dynamic and ever-changing the universe really is. Life’s not static, not even on a cosmic scale.