Yale and Duke Researchers Identify Synthetic Chemicals in Alternative Non-Menthol Cigarettes: Implications for Policy and Public Health

by François Dupont
7 comments
Smoking and Mental Health

Yale and Duke Researchers Identify Synthetic Chemicals in Alternative Non-Menthol Cigarettes: Implications for Policy and Public Health

Scientists from Yale and Duke University have revealed the presence of synthetic chemicals in “non-menthol” cigarettes, which are promoted as substitutes in regions where traditional menthol cigarettes are outlawed. These chemicals, notably a synthetic flavoring compound named WS-3, emulate the cooling sensation provided by menthol but lack its minty flavor.

This finding presents serious challenges to current regulations and the impending U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s prohibition on menthol cigarettes, aimed at discouraging prospective smokers and reducing the harmful health effects of tobacco use.

Municipalities across the United States, as well as states such as Massachusetts and California, have already implemented restrictions on the sale of flavored tobacco products, including those with menthol.

Published on October 9 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the research was conducted by experts from the Yale School of Public Health, the Center for Green Chemistry & Green Engineering at Yale, and Duke School of Medicine. The researchers discovered WS-3 in these alternative “non-menthol” cigarettes, which delivers a cooling sensation comparable to, or even stronger than, menthol, but without its characteristic minty aroma or flavor.

Julie Zimmerman, co-author of the study and professor at the Yale School of Public Health, cautioned that replacing menthol with another odorless cooling agent could negate the effectiveness of existing local and proposed federal bans on menthol cigarettes. The ultimate goal of these bans is to discourage smoking and decrease the incidence of new smokers.

Flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, are particularly appealing to younger individuals and those new to smoking. This type of tobacco product has also been disproportionately marketed to African Americans, 90% of whom who smoke opt for menthol cigarettes. Long-term tobacco use leads to severe health issues, including nicotine addiction, respiratory complications, cancer, and other adverse health effects.

In December 2022, following California’s menthol ban, major tobacco corporations like RJ Reynolds and ITG introduced “non-menthol” cigarette brands with similar packaging and promotional tactics to their menthol counterparts.

In this study, co-lead authors Hanno Erythropel and Sairam Jabba combined bioassay with chemical analysis to investigate whether “non-menthol” cigarettes purchased in California and Massachusetts contained chemicals that activate the cold/menthol receptor in a manner similar to menthol. Their tests identified WS-3 in four of nine analyzed products, all manufactured by RJ Reynolds, and also detected vanilla and tropical flavors in filter capsules of these cigarettes.

The implications of these discoveries are grave, according to Erythropel. He suggests that the U.S. FDA should formulate strategies to address the presence of odorless cooling agents that could evade existing tobacco product flavor regulations. Some countries, including Canada and Belgium, have already commenced actions to tackle this issue.

The interdisciplinary nature of the study, which encompasses toxicology, chemistry, psychiatry, and engineering, underscores the necessity of collaborative efforts in producing impactful research, said Paul Anastas, co-author of the study and professor at the Yale School of the Environment.

Funding for the study was provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institutes of Health, and the Center for Tobacco Products of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Sven-Eric Jordt, associate professor in the Department of Anesthesiology at Duke University School of Medicine, is the senior author of the paper.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about synthetic chemicals in non-menthol cigarettes

What synthetic chemicals have been found in “non-menthol” cigarettes?

Researchers from Yale and Duke University identified a synthetic flavoring agent known as WS-3 in “non-menthol” cigarettes. This chemical provides a cooling sensation similar to or stronger than that of menthol but without the minty aroma or taste.

Who conducted the research on synthetic chemicals in “non-menthol” cigarettes?

The research was conducted by scientists from the Yale School of Public Health, the Center for Green Chemistry & Green Engineering at Yale, and the Duke School of Medicine.

What is the significance of finding synthetic chemicals in “non-menthol” cigarettes?

The presence of synthetic chemicals like WS-3 could undermine existing and future policies aimed at banning menthol cigarettes. These policies are intended to deter potential smokers and mitigate the detrimental health consequences of tobacco consumption.

Are there any states that have already taken action against flavored tobacco products?

Yes, some states such as Massachusetts and California have already implemented restrictions on the sale of flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes.

What steps are being suggested to address the presence of synthetic chemicals in “non-menthol” cigarettes?

It is suggested that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should formulate strategies to address the presence of odorless cooling agents that could evade existing tobacco product flavor regulations.

What are the potential health risks associated with synthetic chemicals like WS-3?

The text does not provide explicit information on the health risks of WS-3, but it does state that flavored tobacco products can lead to severe health issues, including nicotine addiction, respiratory complications, and cancer.

Who funded the study?

The study received funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institutes of Health, and the Center for Tobacco Products of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Have other countries taken steps to address this issue?

Yes, countries like Canada and Belgium have initiated actions against synthetic chemicals in tobacco products. Canada has detailed lists of specific ingredients that are allowed, and Belgium has restrictions on any “cooling” activity in tobacco products.

More about synthetic chemicals in non-menthol cigarettes

You may also like

7 comments

Alan October 21, 2023 - 10:52 pm

Hats off to the researchers for uncovering this. Could be a game-changer in how we deal with tobacco control.

Reply
Karen Williams October 22, 2023 - 2:09 am

This is why we can’t have nice things. Companies always find a loophole. Seriously, this needs more attention!

Reply
Emily_R October 22, 2023 - 8:07 am

Its crazy that companies like RJ Reynolds still find ways to keep addicting ppl. When will it end?

Reply
John Smith October 22, 2023 - 9:50 am

Wow, this is eye-opening! Never thought “non-menthol” cigs could be just as bad. What’s next? Artificially-flavored alcohol?

Reply
Mike_O October 22, 2023 - 11:53 am

kinda scary to think that bans arent enough. They always find a way around it, don’t they.

Reply
Sophia October 22, 2023 - 4:52 pm

I’m not surprised. It’s all about the $$ for tobacco companies. Health? Who cares, right?

Reply
Dave T October 22, 2023 - 7:12 pm

So even if they ban menthol, we still got a problem. what’s the point of regulations if they can be so easily bypassed?

Reply

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

SciTechPost is a web resource dedicated to providing up-to-date information on the fast-paced world of science and technology. Our mission is to make science and technology accessible to everyone through our platform, by bringing together experts, innovators, and academics to share their knowledge and experience.

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!