USDA Scientists Build a Healthy Diet With 91% of Calories Coming From Ultra-Processed Foods

by Amir Hussein
7 comments
Ultra-Processed Foods

Scientists from USDA Demonstrate Viability of Healthy Diets Dominated by Ultra-Processed Foods

A new study conducted by the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center of the USDA Agricultural Research Service has established that a diet containing up to 91% of its calories from ultra-processed foods can still conform to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA), as per the NOVA scale criteria. Further research is planned to explore potential negative health implications of such diets.

Researchers from the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center of the USDA Agricultural Research Service have validated that a nutritious diet can consist of up to 91% ultra-processed foods while still aligning with the recommendations specified in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Additional studies are scheduled to scrutinize the possible health risks involved.

According to the study led by the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center under the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS), it has been established that constructing a healthy diet with 91% of calories from ultra-processed foods is achievable. This is in alignment with the guidelines set forth in the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). The research emphasizes the adaptability of the DGA recommendations in formulating balanced diets.

Julie Hess, an ARS Research Nutritionist at the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, stated, “The study serves as an initial evidence supporting a nuanced perspective on healthy dietary habits, where the utilization of ultra-processed foods could be a viable option. Based on existing nutritional guidelines, the nutritional content and classification of a food item within a particular food group are more critical than the level to which it has been processed.”

Explanation of the NOVA Scale

Within the scope of the study, researchers employed the NOVA scale to classify food items as ultra-processed. The NOVA scale, which was initially introduced in academic literature in 2009, is the predominant scale utilized in nutritional science for categorizing foods based on their processing level. According to this scale, foods can be sorted into:

  1. Unprocessed or minimally processed foods
  2. Processed culinary ingredients
  3. Processed foods
  4. Ultra-processed foods

Details of the Experiment

To evaluate the possibility of constructing a healthy diet using ultra-processed foods, ARS researchers and associated collaborators designed a seven-day meal plan with a 2,000-calorie daily intake. The MyPyramid system was used as a guiding framework. The selected foods were classified as ultra-processed by at least two NOVA evaluators and were in accordance with the 2020 DGA guidelines for servings across various food categories such as fruits, vegetables, grains, protein foods, and dairy.

Food products chosen for the menu were low in saturated fats and added sugars, yet adequate in micronutrients and macronutrients. Examples of such ultra-processed foods included canned beans, instant oatmeal, ultra-filtered milk, whole wheat bread, and dried fruit.

Julie Hess added, “We used the Healthy Eating Index to gauge the dietary quality based on key DGA guidelines. The designed menu achieved a score of 86 out of 100 on the Healthy Eating Index-2015, fulfilling most criteria with the exception of sodium content, which was above recommended levels, and whole grains, which fell short of recommendations.”

Future Avenues for Research

While this research has contributed valuable data to the field, further inquiry is planned. Scientists recognize that observational studies have suggested a potential link between ultra-processed foods and negative health outcomes. Therefore, further studies, particularly intervention-based, are required to expand upon these findings.

The study’s details have been published in The Journal of Nutrition under the title “Dietary Guidelines Meet NOVA: Developing a Menu for A Healthy Dietary Pattern Using Ultra-Processed Foods.” The research was conducted by an interdisciplinary team comprising Julie M. Hess (USDA-ARS), Madeline E. Comeau (USDA-ARS), Shanon Casperson (USDA-ARS), Joanne L. Slavin (University of Minnesota), Guy H. Johnson (Johnson Nutrition Solutions, LLC), Mark Messina (Soy Nutrition Institute Global), Susan Raatz (University of Minnesota), Angela J. Scheett (USDA-ARS), Anne Bodensteiner (University of North Dakota), and Daniel G. Palmer (USDA-ARS). The DOI for the publication is 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.028.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Ultra-Processed Foods

What is the main finding of the USDA’s Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center study?

The primary finding of the study is that it is possible to construct a healthy diet with up to 91% of its caloric content coming from ultra-processed foods, while still adhering to the 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, according to the NOVA scale.

What is the NOVA scale, and how is it used in the study?

The NOVA scale is a classification system used in nutritional science to categorize foods based on their level of processing. It was first introduced in academic literature in 2009 and divides foods into four categories: unprocessed or minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods. In this study, the NOVA scale was employed to classify which foods should be categorized as ultra-processed.

Were there any limitations to the diet constructed in the study?

Yes, while the constructed diet scored 86 out of 100 on the Healthy Eating Index-2015, it exceeded recommended sodium levels and fell short of recommended whole grain intake.

What types of foods were included in the ultra-processed category in the study?

The ultra-processed foods used in the study included canned beans, instant oatmeal, ultra-filtered milk, whole wheat bread, and dried fruit. These were selected to be low in saturated fats and added sugars while still providing sufficient micronutrients and macronutrients.

Is further research planned on the topic?

Yes, the study acknowledges that additional research is required, especially intervention studies. Some observational research has indicated that ultra-processed foods could be associated with adverse health outcomes, and further investigation is needed to explore this.

Where can the details of this study be found?

The study has been published in The Journal of Nutrition under the title “Dietary Guidelines Meet NOVA: Developing a Menu for A Healthy Dietary Pattern Using Ultra-Processed Foods.” The DOI for the publication is 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.028.

Who were the authors involved in this research?

The interdisciplinary team of authors includes Julie M. Hess (USDA-ARS), Madeline E. Comeau (USDA-ARS), Shanon Casperson (USDA-ARS), Joanne L. Slavin (University of Minnesota), Guy H. Johnson (Johnson Nutrition Solutions, LLC), Mark Messina (Soy Nutrition Institute Global), Susan Raatz (University of Minnesota), Angela J. Scheett (USDA-ARS), Anne Bodensteiner (University of North Dakota), and Daniel G. Palmer (USDA-ARS).

More about Ultra-Processed Foods

You may also like

7 comments

Peter Williams August 31, 2023 - 4:19 am

Interesting but the sodium content part worries me. Isn’t high sodium a big no-no?

Reply
Mike Johnson August 31, 2023 - 5:53 am

hold on, does this mean I can eat instant ramen and still be healthy? Lol but seriously, what about sodium levels and stuff?

Reply
Sarah Miller August 31, 2023 - 8:04 am

Can’t wait to see where this research leads. But for now, i’ll stick to my less-processed foods, thank you very much.

Reply
Samantha Brown August 31, 2023 - 8:54 am

Quite eye-opening, to be honest. But I’d still prefer my veggies and fruits over canned beans and instant oatmeal any day.

Reply
Rachel Green August 31, 2023 - 10:55 am

Always thought processed foods = bad, but this kinda changes the game. What’s the USDA thinking, though? gotta read more on this.

Reply
John Smith August 31, 2023 - 1:42 pm

Wow, 91% ultra-processed foods and still healthy? That’s kinda crazy but makes me wonder about long-term effects. more research definitely needed!

Reply
Emily Doe August 31, 2023 - 8:04 pm

I’m all for convenient foods but i have my doubts. isn’t it kinda risky to rely so much on processed stuff?

Reply

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

SciTechPost is a web resource dedicated to providing up-to-date information on the fast-paced world of science and technology. Our mission is to make science and technology accessible to everyone through our platform, by bringing together experts, innovators, and academics to share their knowledge and experience.

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!