Discrediting the Myth of Room Temperature Superconductivity in LK-99: Scientific Findings from the CAS Institute of Physics

by Henrik Andersen
5 comments
Superconductivity

A recent investigation conducted by the CAS Institute of Physics has definitively refuted the previously held notion of room temperature superconductivity in LK-99, a compound that had generated considerable excitement in scientific circles. The study unearthed a crucial revelation: the observed properties of LK-99 were not attributed to superconductivity, as once believed, but rather stemmed from the first-order structural transition of Cu2S impurities. This groundbreaking conclusion brings much-needed clarity to a matter that had previously caused widespread confusion and even gone viral within scientific and public domains.

The latest research has effectively debunked the claims of superconductivity associated with LK-99 by establishing a direct connection between its properties and the structural transition of Cu2S impurities.

Published in the journal “Matter,” this research was spearheaded by Professor Jianlin Luo of the Institute of Physics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The study focused on the compound Pb10-xCux(PO4)6O, commonly known as LK-99, and offered compelling evidence that LK-99 is devoid of superconducting properties, thus laying to rest the previous assertions of its superconductivity.

Origins of the Superconductivity Claims and Their Impact

The origins of this scientific journey can be traced back to the assertions made by Sukbae Lee and his colleagues from South Korea. They initially proposed that LK-99 exhibited superconducting behavior under ambient pressure, boasting a critical temperature (Tc) that reached an impressive 127°C (400 K). This revelation sent ripples of excitement through both the scientific community and the wider public due to the potential technological implications it held.

As reported by Nature News, the claims surrounding the supposed superconductivity of LK-99 swiftly gained notoriety and sparked a wave of replication efforts by scientists and enthusiasts alike. Numerous groups embarked on endeavors to duplicate the results, yet none were able to provide concrete evidence of superconductivity. The most confounding aspect of this enigma was the mysterious sharp drop in resistivity and its exclusive occurrence in a select few samples.

Investigation and the Incontrovertible Conclusion

The investigation undertaken in this study unveiled a crucial piece of the puzzle. The LK-99 samples generated by Lee and his team were found to contain a certain proportion of Cu2S impurities. These impurities underwent a structural phase transition, shifting from a hexagonal structure at high temperatures to a monoclinic structure at around 400 K. Importantly, the researchers observed that the resistivity of Cu2S experienced a dramatic decrease, amounting to three to four orders of magnitude, at approximately 385 K—a temperature proximate to the previously reported transition temperature.

Additionally, the study involved measurements of the resistivity of a mixture comprising LK-99 and Cu2S. Remarkably, a sharp resistivity transition was identified at a temperature consistent with earlier findings, but notably, it did not exhibit zero resistance.

It is crucial to underscore the significant divergence between a first-order structural transition and a second-order superconducting transition. The researchers detected thermal hysteresis behavior in the resistivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, unequivocally confirming that what had been observed was indeed a first-order transition, definitively ruling out the possibility of a second-order superconducting transition.

In summary, this study, titled “First-order transition in LK-99 containing Cu2S” and authored by Shilin Zhu, Wei Wu, Zheng Li, and Jianlin Luo, published on November 24, 2023, in the journal “Matter,” has conclusively disproven the notion of room temperature superconductivity in LK-99. The research received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, and CAS, underscoring the significance of these findings in the realm of materials science and condensed matter physics.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Superconductivity

What were the initial claims about LK-99’s superconductivity?

The initial claims suggested that LK-99 exhibited superconducting properties at ambient pressure, with a critical temperature (Tc) of up to 127°C (400 K).

Why did these claims generate excitement in the scientific community?

The claims generated excitement due to the potential technological implications of room temperature superconductivity, which could revolutionize various fields, including energy transmission and storage.

How did the study disprove these claims?

The study found that the observed properties of LK-99 were not due to superconductivity but were linked to the first-order structural transition of Cu2S impurities present in the compound.

What is the significance of this discovery?

This discovery clarifies the true nature of LK-99’s properties and corrects the misconceptions about its superconductivity, which had caused confusion in scientific circles.

What are the implications for future research in superconductivity?

The study underscores the importance of rigorous investigation and replication efforts in scientific research. It highlights the need for caution when interpreting experimental results and the importance of understanding underlying mechanisms in materials science.

More about Superconductivity

You may also like

5 comments

JournalistExpert123 November 29, 2023 - 4:18 am

amazing findin dis study! lk99 not suprcondctr!_xD83D__xDE2E_

Reply
FinanceWizard46 November 29, 2023 - 9:32 am

impurities, not suprconductivity? intersting twist in da story! _xD83D__xDCB0__xD83E__xDDEA_

Reply
CuriousScientist_88 November 29, 2023 - 11:01 am

wow! previus claims were wrrong, sciens is tricky, nice wrk!

Reply
EconPoliticAnalyst November 29, 2023 - 4:19 pm

dis resrch mks it clear, no suprconductvity in lk99, impurity rulz. _xD83D__xDCDA__xD83D__xDD0D_

Reply
SeriousReader2023 November 29, 2023 - 6:59 pm

gr8 job on disvovring da truth bout lk99! impurities, not suprcondctvity!_xD83E__xDDD0_

Reply

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

SciTechPost is a web resource dedicated to providing up-to-date information on the fast-paced world of science and technology. Our mission is to make science and technology accessible to everyone through our platform, by bringing together experts, innovators, and academics to share their knowledge and experience.

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

© 2023 SciTechPost

en_USEnglish