Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have successfully examined 13 studies that applied a genotype-first approach to patient care, revealing novel relationships between genes and diseases. The new approach deviates from the traditional phenotype-first methodology in medical research that typically starts with clinical findings.
In the genotype-first approach, patients with particular genomic variants are chosen, and their traits and symptoms are then studied. The results of this novel methodology have broadened the understanding of symptoms linked to known disorders, uncovered new associations between genes and diseases, and given insights into newly identified disorders. The findings have been published in the American Journal of Human Genetics.
The lead author of the study, Dr. Caralynn Wilczewski, a genetic counselor at the National Human Genome Research Institute’s (NHGRI) Reverse Phenotyping Core, explains that this research demonstrates that the genotype-first method is particularly useful in identifying individuals with rare disorders who otherwise may have been overlooked in clinical settings.
Typically, when dealing with genetic conditions, patients exhibiting symptoms are first identified, and their genomes are then studied to determine potential explanatory variants. This traditional approach can introduce bias as it relies heavily on the researchers’ preconceived understanding of the disorders. Moreover, it can restrict researchers from comprehending the full spectrum of symptoms and the associated genomic variants.
The genotype-first approach holds potential for transforming reactive medicine into a preventative form of care, says Leslie Biesecker, M.D., a distinguished NIH investigator and director of NHGRI’s Center for Precision Health Research. This methodology could be a stepping stone towards predictive and precision medicine.
The study classified three primary discoveries from the genotype-first approach. Firstly, it assisted in establishing new relationships between genomic variants and specific clinical traits. For instance, one NIH study discovered that more than two copies of the TPSAB1 gene were linked with symptoms related to the gastrointestinal tract, connective tissues, and the nervous system.
Secondly, the approach helped uncover novel symptoms of a disorder that had previously gone undetected due to the patient not displaying typical symptoms. This was exemplified when NHGRI researchers identified an individual with a genomic variant linked to a known metabolic disorder. Further investigation revealed that this person had high levels of certain chemicals, despite exhibiting only minor symptoms.
Finally, the genotype-first approach allowed for a better understanding of the function of specific genomic variants, potentially assisting clinicians in understanding newly described disorders.
The 13 studies employed genomic data from over 16,000 research participants, collected through programs like ClinSeq(R) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) Centralized Sequencing Protocol.
NIH intramural researchers now have access to the exome and genome sequencing data from participants who consented to broad genomic data sharing and future research contact through the Reverse Phenotyping Core Genomic Data Browser.
The researchers propose a framework for other institutions looking to conduct genotype-first studies. The framework emphasizes broad genomic data sharing, informed consent with recontact provisions, strategic planning for deciding on genomic findings to be returned, and communication with study participants.
Dr. Clesson Turner, director of NHGRI’s Reverse Phenotyping Core, commented on the framework: “With more programs adopting this approach, we can improve our understanding of the predictive potential of genomic medicine.”
Dr. Wilczewski adds that the adoption of this approach by more researchers could potentially help more individuals who may benefit from having their genome sequenced, especially as genome-sequencing studies diversify in terms of participant population.
Funding for this research was provided by the NIH and the National Human Genome Research Institute.
Reference: “Genotype first: Clinical genomics research through a reverse phenotyping approach” by Caralynn M. Wilczewski, et al. American Journal of Human Genetics, 5 January 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.12.004.
Table of Contents
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Genotype-first approach
What is the genotype-first approach to patient care?
The genotype-first approach is a method of patient care where individuals with specific genomic variants are selected, and their traits and symptoms are studied. This methodology contrasts with the traditional phenotype-first approach, which begins with identifying patients exhibiting symptoms and then searching for potential explanatory genomic variants.
Who conducted the assessment of the genotype-first approach?
Researchers from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) conducted the assessment of 13 studies utilizing the genotype-first approach to patient care.
What were the primary findings of the studies using the genotype-first approach?
The genotype-first approach allowed researchers to discover new relationships between genomic variants and specific clinical traits, find novel symptoms of disorders that were previously undetected, and better understand the function of specific genomic variants.
How does the genotype-first approach affect traditional medical practice?
The genotype-first approach offers potential for transforming reactive medicine into a more preventative form of care. It may also serve as a foundation for developing predictive and precision medicine.
What is the proposed framework for implementing the genotype-first approach?
The framework for implementing the genotype-first approach emphasizes broad genomic data sharing, obtaining informed consent from participants with recontact provisions, strategic planning for deciding on genomic findings to be returned, and maintaining active communication with study participants.
What potential future impacts could adopting the genotype-first approach have?
Adopting the genotype-first approach could potentially help more individuals who may benefit from having their genome sequenced, especially as genome-sequencing studies diversify in terms of participant population.
More about Genotype-first approach
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute
- American Journal of Human Genetics
- The Genotype-first approach study
- NHGRI’s Center for Precision Health Research
- ClinSeq
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID)
6 comments
Incredible stuff! If we could catch diseases before they even manifest with this genotype approach… the future of medicine is lookin pretty bright, isn’t it?
As a genetics grad student, I’m so excited about this! Genotype-first could be a game-changer, but it’ll need a ton of ethical discussions and regulations.
im just a layman here, but isn’t it scary that researchers can know so much about us just from our genes? seems like a privacy nightmare to me.
This sounds revolutionary! but, will it be accessible to everyone? or just another thing for the rich folks?
If adopted widely, this could revolutionize how we treat and diagnose patients. A step towards personalized medicine indeed, we’ve come a long way!
Predictive medicine sounds awesome but kinda scary 2. Does this mean doctors can tell me what diseases i’ll get in the future? Wow…