Recent scientific research has overturned the long-held belief that opposites attract, revealing instead a tendency for people to form relationships with those who share similar characteristics. This significant study carries important implications for our understanding of genetic and social patterns, highlighting the role of like-minded pairing in shaping future generations and socio-economic dynamics.
The study, which involved data analysis of millions of couples, indicates a preference for similar individuals to form relationships.
Contrary to the widely held view, the new research from CU Boulder, encompassing over 130 characteristics and millions of couples spanning a century, finds that similarities, not differences, are the basis for attraction.
Tanya Horwitz, the lead author and a doctoral candidate at the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and the Institute for Behavioral Genetics (IBG), notes that the study confirms the tendency for similar people to associate more often, contradicting the old saying that opposites attract. The research, which appeared in Nature Human Behaviour on August 31, showed that in 82% to 89% of the traits examined – including political beliefs, age at first sexual experience, and substance use habits – partners were more likely to share similarities.
In only 3% of the traits, in one aspect of their analysis, did individuals choose partners who were dissimilar. This finding has significant ramifications for genetic research, as it challenges the assumption of random mating in human genetics models.
The study, which also included a meta-analysis of previous research, analyzed 22 traits across 199 studies involving various types of couples dating back to 1903, and 133 traits in nearly 80,000 opposite-sex pairs from the UK Biobank. Same-sex couples were not included, with their patterns being studied separately.
The findings showed strong correlations in traits such as political and religious views, education levels, and certain IQ measures. For example, the correlation for political values was .58 on a scale where 1 indicates identical traits. Substance use habits also showed high correlations.
However, traits like height, weight, medical conditions, and personality characteristics had lower, yet still positive, correlations. For example, the correlation for neuroticism was .11. Some traits, like extroversion, showed little correlation.
In some rare cases, the study found small, negative correlations in traits like chronotype (morning or night preference), worry tendency, and hearing difficulty, suggesting occasional opposite attraction. The most commonly shared trait among couples was birth year.
The study also indicates that our choices in relationships might be influenced by factors we’re not fully aware of.
The implications of this study are far-reaching. For instance, mating patterns based on similar physical or psychological traits could lead to greater extremes in these traits in future generations. The study also raises questions about the increasing tendency for people with similar educational backgrounds to pair up, potentially exacerbating socio-economic divides.
The authors emphasize the modest nature of these correlations and caution against misinterpreting or misusing these findings. They hope the study will inspire further interdisciplinary research in fields ranging from economics to sociology, anthropology, and psychology.
The study, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the National Science Foundation, represents a significant contribution to our understanding of human relationships and their genetic and societal implications.
Table of Contents
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Relationship Dynamics
Does the study suggest opposites attract in relationships?
No, the study debunks the myth that opposites attract, showing a tendency for people to partner with those who share similar traits in most aspects.
What are the key findings of the CU Boulder study on relationships?
The study found that in 82% to 89% of traits analyzed, ranging from political leanings to substance use habits, partners were more likely to be similar. This challenges the traditional belief that opposites attract in relationships.
How does this study impact our understanding of human mating patterns?
The research suggests that human mating is not random but rather based on similarities in traits, which has significant implications for genetic research and societal trends.
What does the study say about the correlation of traits in couples?
It found strong correlations in traits like political and religious attitudes, education levels, and certain IQ measures, indicating that people tend to partner up with those having similar traits.
Were same-sex couples included in this research?
No, same-sex couples were not included in this research. The study focused on opposite-sex pairs, and the patterns in same-sex relationships are being explored separately.
What are the potential social implications of this study’s findings?
The study suggests that assortative mating, where individuals with similar traits couple up, could lead to more pronounced traits in future generations and potentially widen socio-economic divides.
How does this study contribute to interdisciplinary research?
The study’s findings are hoped to spark more research across disciplines, including economics, sociology, anthropology, and psychology, to understand better how and why people form relationships.
More about Relationship Dynamics
- CU Boulder Study on Relationship Dynamics
- Nature Human Behaviour Journal
- Institute for Behavioral Genetics
- UK Biobank Research Database
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- National Science Foundation
6 comments
so if we all pair up with similar people, what does that mean for society as a whole? could get a bit boring no?
wow, this is super interesting, never thought that we actually prefer similar people over opposites, makes you rethink all those old sayings right?
I’m not surprised at all, me and my partner are like two peas in a pod, always thought that was the norm tbh
I’ve always been attracted to people like me, guess I’m not alone! but what about the thrill of meeting someone completely different?
Interesting read, but i wonder how this applies to friendships, not just romantic relationships, anyone else curious?
kinda makes sense, but what about those couples that seem totally different? there’s always exceptions i guess