Human-Induced Mass Extinction Severely Dismantles Life’s Evolutionary Network

by Liam O'Connor
6 comments
Biological Annihilation

Human activities have led to an accelerated rate of extinction among vertebrate species, resulting not only in the disappearance of individual species but also of entire genera, critically undermining global biodiversity. Termed as “biological annihilation” by researchers, this phenomenon has far-reaching implications for human existence, ecological balance, and potential advancements in medicine, thereby necessitating immediate, large-scale interventions.

Notable examples like the passenger pigeon, the Tasmanian tiger, and the Baiji (a dolphin from the Yangtze river) represent the broader phenomenon often referred to as the sixth mass extinction. This rapid decline in animal populations is occurring hundreds of times faster than their natural extinction rates, primarily due to human-induced factors.

Recent research from Stanford University and the National Autonomous University of Mexico, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggests that the problem might be even more grave. Each of the aforementioned species was also the last existing member of its genus—a taxonomical rank higher than species.

While past discussions have concentrated on the extinction of species, this new study by Gerardo Ceballos, senior researcher at the Institute of Ecology at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and Paul Ehrlich, Bing Professor of Population Studies, Emeritus, at Stanford University, reveals that entire genera are also disappearing. This has been described as a “dismantling of life’s evolutionary lineage.”

In Ceballos’ words, “Long-term impacts on life’s evolutionary progression are immense, and these disruptions will also have substantial implications for human society within this century.”

“Our ongoing extinction crisis erases our sole known living counterparts in the universe,” added Ehrlich, who also holds an emeritus senior fellowship at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

Catastrophic Loss on Multiple Fronts

Recent improvements in databases from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Birdlife International have allowed researchers to examine extinction at the level of genera. Analyzing 5,400 genera of terrestrial vertebrates that include 34,600 species, Ceballos and Ehrlich discovered that 73 genera have become extinct since the year 1500. The worst affected were birds with 44 genera extinctions, followed by mammals, amphibians, and reptiles.

The present rate of genus extinction among vertebrates surpasses historical rates by a factor of 35, based on calculations by Anthony Barnosky, professor emeritus of integrative biology at UC Berkeley. Without human intervention, only two genera would have likely become extinct over the last million years. Thus, human activities have caused a wave of extinctions that would naturally take approximately 18,000 years to occur.

Ceballos advises caution against alarmism but emphasizes the urgent necessity to communicate the magnitude of the crisis, stating, “The ethical imperative is clear; we must convey the seriousness of the situation as we are deeply concerned.”

Compounded Impact, Expanded Consequences

The extinction of genera has more far-reaching consequences than the loss of individual species. When a species becomes extinct, other species within its genus often step in to fill the ecological void, preserving the balance to some extent. But when an entire genus is lost, the void is much larger, requiring tens of millions of years of evolutionary development to recover—a timeframe humanity cannot afford to wait for, says Ceballos.

For instance, the increase in Lyme disease can be traced back to the extinction of the passenger pigeon. Once a competitor for food with white-footed mice, the primary carriers of the disease, the absence of the pigeon has led to an explosion in mouse populations and consequently, human Lyme disease cases.

This is but a single example. The loss of multiple genera could trigger a series of cascading catastrophes for human civilization. It also limits our scientific understanding, as highlighted by the extinction of the gastric brooding frog, which had potential implications for studying diseases like acid reflux.

Imperative for Coordinated Action

In the quest to mitigate further losses and their societal ramifications, Ceballos and Ehrlich call for sweeping political, economic, and social reforms. Special attention should be given to tropical regions due to their high concentration of both extinct and critically endangered genera. Enhanced public awareness and integrative conservation policies are needed, especially given the interplay between mass extinction and the escalating climate crisis.

“The escalation of human population size, increasing resource consumption, and the unequal distribution of consumption are all significant contributors to the current crisis,” the researchers stated.

Continuing on this path while expecting to preserve biodiversity is untenable, warns Ehrlich: “It’s akin to sawing off the branch on which you are seated.”

Reference: “Dismantling of Life’s Evolutionary Lineage via Mass Extinction of Animal Genera” by Gerardo Ceballos and Paul R. Ehrlich, 18 September 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306987120

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Biological Annihilation

What is the main theme of the article?

The main theme of the article is the accelerated extinction of vertebrate species and entire genera due to human activities, a phenomenon termed as “biological annihilation.”

Who conducted the research mentioned in the article?

The research was conducted by Gerardo Ceballos from the National Autonomous University of Mexico and Paul Ehrlich from Stanford University.

What are the primary consequences of this “biological annihilation”?

The primary consequences include a devastating impact on global biodiversity, ecological balance, potential advancements in medicine, and long-term implications for human society.

What is the difference between the extinction of species and the extinction of genera in terms of impact?

The extinction of individual species often allows other species within the same genus to fill the ecological void. However, the extinction of entire genera creates a much larger void that requires tens of millions of years of evolutionary development to recover.

What data sources were used for this study?

The researchers used data from the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Birdlife International, and other databases to analyze 5,400 genera of terrestrial vertebrates, encompassing 34,600 species.

How many genera have gone extinct since the year 1500 according to the study?

The study reveals that 73 genera of land-dwelling vertebrates have become extinct since the year 1500.

What immediate actions do the researchers recommend?

The researchers call for sweeping political, economic, and social reforms to mitigate further losses and their societal ramifications. They specifically recommend prioritizing conservation efforts in tropical regions.

How does this extinction crisis intersect with the climate crisis?

The loss of biodiversity due to mass extinction exacerbates the worsening climate crisis, as the nature of plants, animals, and microbes on the planet are significant determinants of the climate.

What is the role of human population and consumption in this crisis?

The escalation of human population size, increasing resource consumption, and the unequal distribution of consumption are all significant contributors to this extinction crisis.

Is there a connection between the extinction of genera and human diseases?

Yes, the article cites the example of the increasing prevalence of Lyme disease due to the extinction of the passenger pigeon, which used to compete for food with white-footed mice, the primary carriers of the disease.

More about Biological Annihilation

You may also like

6 comments

Mike Brown September 19, 2023 - 4:38 pm

73 genera gone since 1500? Those are staggering numbers. And this isn’t even including the climate crisis impacts. What are we doing to our planet?

Reply
Sarah Williams September 19, 2023 - 7:23 pm

Biological Annihilation? that’s a strong term. But then again, maybe strong terms are what we need right now to get people’s attention.

Reply
Emily Smith September 19, 2023 - 9:47 pm

This article is eye-opening! Had no idea we were losing entire ‘branches’ of life. But what’s the action plan, exactly?

Reply
John Doe September 20, 2023 - 12:48 am

Wow, this is scary stuff. we really need to wake up and do something about it. Extinct genera? That’s on a whole other level.

Reply
Robert Johnson September 20, 2023 - 11:40 am

So, we’re basically ‘sawing off the limb we’re sitting on.’ Great. why aren’t policy makers reading this?

Reply
Linda Davis September 20, 2023 - 12:02 pm

I wish more people would take the time to read articles like this. It’s not just about the animals, it’s about the future of humanity too.

Reply

Leave a Comment

* By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

SciTechPost is a web resource dedicated to providing up-to-date information on the fast-paced world of science and technology. Our mission is to make science and technology accessible to everyone through our platform, by bringing together experts, innovators, and academics to share their knowledge and experience.

Subscribe

Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!