A recent University of Washington study, delving into an 800-year-old ice core, has revealed that phytoplankton populations in the North Atlantic have remained consistent since the industrial revolution. Contrary to prior beliefs of a substantial decline, this research underscores the influence of industrial pollutants on atmospheric chemistry. Source: SciTechPost.com
Recent findings have shown that phytoplankton populations in the North Atlantic have not fluctuated significantly since the onset of the industrial era, challenging earlier beliefs of their decline.
Echoing the sentiments of Mark Twain, the idea of a decrease in North Atlantic phytoplankton may have been overstated. A notable 2019 study, using ice cores from Antarctica, indicated a 10% reduction in marine productivity in the North Atlantic during the industrial era, raising concerns about a continuing downward trend.
However, newer research spearheaded by the University of Washington suggests a different scenario. The investigation into an 800-year-old ice core indicates that phytoplankton in the North Atlantic – vital for the broader marine ecosystem – have been more resilient than previously thought. This complex atmospheric process could explain the observed trends.
The findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Satellite imagery can detect chlorophyll reflections, indicative of photosynthetic organisms like phytoplankton. Images from the North Atlantic show these reflections, mingling with ocean currents. While previous studies based on ice core analysis reported a 10% decrease in North Atlantic phytoplankton since the mid-19th century, recent research suggests these populations might be more stable. Credit: NASA
Exploring Phytoplankton’s Importance
Phytoplankton, minuscule photosynthetic organisms, form the foundation of the marine food web. They play a crucial role globally, producing approximately half of the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere.
Due to their small size, direct counting of phytoplankton is challenging. Scientists have developed alternative methods to estimate their numbers. One such method involves tracking dimethyl sulfide emissions, a gas responsible for the distinct smell of beaches. Once released, it transforms into methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and sulfate, which are eventually deposited on land or snow. Ice cores can thus be used to infer historical phytoplankton populations.
Becky Alexander, at the University of Washington’s IsoLab, examines an ice core extracted from Greenland. Her team’s analysis of this core suggests that emissions from photosynthetic marine organisms have been consistent since the mid-1800s. Credit: Mark Stone/University of Washington
Insights from Greenland’s Ice Cores
“Analysis of Greenland ice cores indicated a decrease in MSA concentrations over the industrial era, initially interpreted as a sign of reduced primary productivity in the North Atlantic,” explains Ursula Jongebloed, a doctoral student at the university. “However, our research, which also examined sulfate in a Greenland ice core, demonstrates that MSA levels alone do not provide a complete picture of primary productivity.”
Since the mid-19th century, industrial activities have released sulfur gases into the atmosphere. These gases contain distinct sulfur isotopes, allowing differentiation between marine and terrestrial sources in ice cores.
Broader Historical Context
This study delves deeper than previous research by examining various sulfur-containing molecules in a Greenland ice core, covering the period from 1200 to 2006. The findings suggest that human-made pollutants altered atmospheric chemistry, affecting the gases released by phytoplankton.
“Our findings from the ice cores show an increase in sulfate from phytoplankton during the industrial era,” Jongebloed notes. “This implies that the decline in MSA is balanced by an increase in phytoplankton-derived sulfate, suggesting overall stability in phytoplankton sulfur emissions.”
Ursula Jongebloed utilizes a stable isotope mass spectrometer in the university’s IsoLab to analyze sulfur isotopes in the Greenland ice core. These isotopes help trace changes in sulfate sources over the centuries, including marine phytoplankton, fossil fuel emissions, and volcanic activity. Credit: Mark Stone/University of Washington
Conclusions and Future Directions
Considering this balance, phytoplankton populations appear to have remained stable since the mid-19th century. However, the researchers caution that marine ecosystems still face multiple threats.
“Analyzing both MSA and phytoplankton-derived sulfate offers a more comprehensive view of changes in emissions from marine primary producers over time,” states senior author Becky Alexander, a professor at the university.
Combining ice core measurements with other independent estimates of phytoplankton abundance, such as chlorophyll data, and integrating modeling studies, can enhance our understanding of historical changes in marine productivity and predict future trends.
The study, “Industrial-era decline in Arctic methanesulfonic acid is offset by increased biogenic sulfate aerosol” by Ursula A. Jongebloed and colleagues, was published on 17 November 2023 in
Table of Contents
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about North Atlantic phytoplankton stability
Has the population of North Atlantic phytoplankton changed since the industrial era?
Contrary to earlier studies that suggested a decline, recent research by the University of Washington using an 800-year-old ice core indicates that the population of North Atlantic phytoplankton has remained stable since the industrial era.
What method was used to study the phytoplankton population changes?
The study utilized ice core analysis from Greenland, which included examining various sulfur-containing molecules in the ice layers spanning from the year 1200 to 2006. This method helped in understanding the changes in atmospheric chemistry and its impact on phytoplankton.
What was the significance of the previous study using Antarctic ice cores?
A previous study conducted in 2019 using Antarctic ice cores had suggested a 10% decrease in North Atlantic marine productivity during the industrial era. This study raised concerns about the continuous decline of phytoplankton.
How do phytoplankton affect the Earth’s atmosphere?
Phytoplankton, being microscopic photosynthetic organisms, play a crucial role in the marine ecosystem and the Earth’s atmosphere. They produce approximately half of the oxygen present in Earth’s atmosphere.
What was the new finding about sulfur emissions from phytoplankton?
The recent study found that the decline in methanesulfonic acid (MSA) in ice cores was offset by an increase in phytoplankton-derived sulfate. This indicates that sulfur emissions from phytoplankton have been stable overall since the mid-1800s.
What does this study imply for future marine ecosystem research?
This study highlights the importance of considering a range of factors, including both MSA and phytoplankton-derived sulfate, for a comprehensive understanding of changes in marine primary producers over time. It suggests that marine ecosystems may be more resilient but still face multiple threats.
More about North Atlantic phytoplankton stability
- University of Washington Research Findings
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Publication
- SciTechPost.com Original Article
- NASA Satellite Imagery of Phytoplankton
- 2019 Antarctic Ice Core Study Report
- Marine Biology and Climate Change Research
- Environmental Impact of Industrial Pollutants
6 comments
really interesting research I didn’t know phytoplankton were so important for our planet!
i’m surprised satellites can detect chlorophyll from space. technology is really changing how we understand the earth
Woah, so the phytoplankton are doing okay? that’s some good news for a change in all this climate talk
Greenland’s ice cores, who would’ve thought they’d tell us so much about the ocean? nature is amazing
is it just me or is climate change seriously affecting everything? these studies are eye-opening but also kinda scary
great article but i think it could use more info on how they actually do these ice core analyses, sounds complicated